From June 16 to 18, the Spanish Society of Pedagogy (SEP), in collaboration with the University of Seville, its Faculty of Education Sciences, and the LITERACIES research group (HUM1044), organized the 18th National and 11th Ibero-American Conference of Pedagogy (SEPCON25) at the Faculty of Education Sciences of the University of Seville.
Dr. Maria Rosa Buxarrais, along with Dr. Juan Llanes, both from the Faculty of Education of the University of Barcelona, presented a paper at this forum entitled “El “peer review” en la docencia universitario: Un análisis disciplinar de la tarea docente como reto de mejora y calidad” (see abstract below).

Abstract
“The presented research is part of the project “El peer review en docencia: el análisis disciplinar de la tarea docente como reto de mejora y calidad”, led by the University of Barcelona. This project brought together 27 instructors from various disciplines with the aim of opening up university classrooms to peer observation, thereby promoting collaborative reflection on teaching. The main research questions were: How does peer observation influence teaching self-assessment? and What specific contributions does this practice provide to student learning? The theoretical framework is based on literature concerning peer observation (Bell & Cooper, 2013; Hammersley-Fletcher & Orsmond, 2004), self-regulation and pedagogical reflection (Clark, 2012; Fernández & Paricio, 2019), and the importance of breaking with “pedagogical solitude” (Shulman, 1993) to build collaborative teaching communities focused on the continuous improvement of educational practice.
The methodological approach is qualitative, using peer observation as the primary strategy (Bell & Cooper, 2013). An instrument structured around four dimensions was designed: session organization, fostering interest, dialogic interaction, and strategies for self-regulation (Otero-Saborido et al., 2024). This instrument includes express observations (one day in the classroom) and long-term observations, with scheduled visits. The experience, supported by models of reflective feedback (Jones & Gallen, 2016), was carried out in an interdisciplinary context, fostering shared analysis among teachers from different areas. Furthermore, data were collected using evaluation forms and interviews to identify strengths and areas for improvement.
The research results highlight the usefulness of peer review as a tool for continuous improvement in university teaching (Hammersley-Fletcher & Orsmond, 2004). Among the main contributions, a higher level of self-reflection among instructors regarding their pedagogical practices was identified, derived from the structured analysis and subsequent discussions (Clark, 2012; Shulman, 1993). Likewise, the experience promoted interdisciplinary exchange, enriching teaching perspectives through the integration of varied approaches (Fernández & Paricio, 2019).
Furthermore, the use of the developed instrument made it possible to identify key elements in the planning and execution of teaching sessions, as well as effective strategies for fostering student participation and autonomous learning (Otero-Saborido et al., 2024). Finally, it was observed that these practices strengthen cohesion among the teaching staff and generate learning communities oriented toward constant improvement, in line with the proposals of Bell and Cooper (2013)“.